A working playbook still needed a local test.
Filo had 2M+ users when I joined. The existing marketplace provided a starting point, but bringing it to the US required understanding whether its matching experience met local student expectations.
Students wanted to learn together.
Across 100+ user interviews, collaborative learning emerged as a key need for the US experience. That called for more than translating the interface. Matching, onboarding, and the session itself needed to support that expectation.
The decision
- Chose
- US-specific matching for collaborative learning.
- Over
- Port the existing India matching model.
- Evidence
- 100+ user interviews informed the US experience.
- Trade-off
- Adapt the matching and session experience instead of reusing the existing playbook unchanged.
- Cost
- Dedicated work on US matching, onboarding, and session continuity.
Make the promise visible in the request path.
The experience connected uploaded problems, OCR intake, US-specific matching, tutor acceptance, and a live session. Matching had a 60-second target. Session continuity and low-bandwidth audio/video supported the experience after the match.
I worked across the activation funnel and student and tutor onboarding, with quality thresholds and fraud detection supporting marketplace trust.
System Details
- Intake
- Upload a problem and use OCR to support intake.
- Matching
- US-specific logic with a 60-second target.
- Measured result
- 98% of US requests matched in under 45 seconds.
- Sessions
- Tutor acceptance, session continuity, and low-bandwidth audio/video.
- Trust
- Tutor onboarding, quality thresholds, and fraud detection.
- Research
- 100+ user interviews.
A US marketplace with a promise it could keep.
The US marketplace went on to reach 120K users and $1.5M ARR in six months. 98% of US requests matched in under 45 seconds against a 60-second target.
Activation increased 35% and conversion reached 3%+.
Local insight belongs in the core product.
Market entry is a product decision, not just a distribution decision. Trust came from adapting the experience to how students wanted to learn and then delivering on a measurable promise.